Saturday, December 26, 2009

Happy Holidays


The holidays can sometimes provide some challenges for executives and HR professionals. While we want to have a good working environment for all employees, the holidays can sometimes cause difficult situations. Recently, I received a complaint that our former Good Friday holiday is now called “Spring Holiday” yet the Christmas holiday was still named Christmas. Also, complaints were received that the Christmas Party is now called the Holiday Party and the Christmas tree was absent this year. As organizations try to be mindful of all employees with differing cultures, religions, and races, some employees may be okay with the non-denominational changes, but others are not, and are not afraid to voice their complaints. Is there a valid point here? Should Christian holidays be included in the workplace regardless, since its tradition? Employees forget that we do not all have the same beliefs, and while some traditions are okay for some employees, it may not be okay for others. In order to have a work culture that conducive to welcoming all races, religions, backgrounds, and personal beliefs, we must be careful about not forcing religious holidays upon all employees.


(btw I am Christian, but want to be sure all employees have a good work environment, regardless of my personal beliefs)

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Happy Thanksgiving

What I'm Thankful For This Thanksgiving, we have a lot to be thankful for.

Here's my partial list: I am thankful for . . .

Employees from hell.
Managers who begin phrases with, "I know I shouldn't say this, but . .."
FMLA and employees who don't give notice.
Changes in technology just for the fun of it.
Mandates from corporate that don't make sense.
Increasing health benefits costs.
Lawyers who need to review all documents before distributed.
Managers that don't understand management.
Management that doesn't understand employees.
Teams that won't get along.
Mergers and acquisitions with 14 different pay plans, benefit plans, and policies and procedures.
New laws that no one understands how to interpret.
Top talent who leave the organization because a competing organization offers better perks.
Too many applicants.
Too few applicants with the right skill sets.
Hiring managers who insist on asking job applicants, "where are you from?"
Managers who think older workers are naturally "overqualified."
Slashed budgets.


Why am I thankful for all these things? Because they ensure that we will always need human resources professionals!


May you have a blessed Thanksgiving and holiday season!




Reference
An e-briefing from Cathy Fyock and Innovative Management Concepts

Monday, October 26, 2009

Thrown under a bus?

What do you do when you get thrown under a bus by a friend, coworker, or even your boss? I know every detail of a bus undercarriage, so I thought I’d post my thoughts about this.

First of all, if you have never heard this term, it means that that someone has said or done something to make you look bad. It could be true, such as something you said in confidence has been repeated making you look bad. Or, it could be completely false. This leaves you wanting to defend yourself. Be careful how this is done. If the facts revealed are true, then it might be best to go to the person and possibly explain what was said. Once, I was grilled by a VP about an employee that I worked with. The VP then took what I said and used it to complain to the CEO. What I thought was discussed in confidence, was not. I have learned that all communication at work is not confidential. I then went to the employee and told them what I said was taken out of context and what was said to the CEO was not what I meant. Not surprisingly, that VP was let go shortly after. I’m glad the CEO didn’t buy into the feeding frenzy.


So, what if it’s your boss that throws you under the bus. Now we are stepping on sacred ground. Never, ever throw your own boss under the bus. That is just corporate suicide. However, if something is said that is not true, or you don’t agree with, go to the boss and explain that you did do your job (if that’s the case), and what you did. Basically, defend yourself, but in a professional non-emotion manner. Also, never go over your bosses head to his boss. That will just bite you on the back side when the bosses boss tells your boss what you said. You might as well get the resume out (this applies to day to day complaints, not direct supervisor harassment issues).


What to do when the boss is wrong? Go to him and explain why you think the decision might be wrong. Again, don’t be defensive, just explain professionally and let the boss make the final decision. If the boss does not like your idea, that is his/her choice. But at least you expressed your opinion on the matter, and you are basically off the hook for a possible bad decision.

Friday, August 21, 2009

Exempt vs. Non Exempt

Exempt or Non-Exempt from Overtime

“We will just pay all employees a salary, and make them Exempt.” I’d like to have dime for every time I’ve heard that.

California is a sticky state in regards to classifying employees as Exempt or Non-Exempt, as the laws and regulations are stricter than the Federal laws. Employees must be classified correctly based on their actual job duties and must fall under one of the following exemptions to be exempt: Executive, Administrative, Professional, Artists, or Outside Salespeople. They must also make two times the minimum wage for the Exempt status to apply.

The employee’s job title and method of payment are irrelevant in classifying exempt employees.* Employees must meet all the requirements under one of the Exemptions listed.

Executive Exemption:
This is usually for management employees, but managers must meet all the requirements:
-Management of department or division
-Direct the work of two or more employees
-Has authority to hire and fire
-Exercises discretionary powers
-Is primarily engaged (more than 50%) in the above duties.
-Earns a monthly salary of no less than two times the minimum wage.

Examples of non-exempt work:
-Performing the same kind of work as subordinates
-Production work
-Making sales, stocking
-Clerical duties

Administrative Exemption:
To determine if an employee is exempt under the Administrative Exemption we need to look at the duties the employee performs and well as their salary. They must meet the following requirements:

-Has duties involving office or non-manual work directly related to management policies or operations
-Performs customary and regularly uses discretion and independent judgment in executive or administrative capacity.
-General supervision only of work for specialized or technical duties which require special training.
-Primarily engaged (more than 50%) in the above activities and monthly salary is no less than two times the state minimum wage.

Examples of non-exempt work:
Clerical, deliveries, operating equipment, inspecting, tabulating data.

Professional Exemption:
A professional employee must meet all of the following requirements to be considered exempt under the Profession Exemption:
- Is licensed by the State of California and in the practice of one of these professions: law, medicine, dentistry, optometry, architecture, engineering, teaching, or accounting; or
- Is primarily engaged in an occupation that is known as a learned or artistic profession such as specialized intellectual instruction in science, original and creative artistic work, work that is predominately intellectual.
- Exercises discretion and independent judgment
- Earns a monthly salary no less than two times the state minimum wage.

Examples of non-exempt work: Nurses, paralegals, uncertified accountants, editors, artists, copy writers

Examples of exempt professions: Doctors, attorneys, CPA’s, licensed civil and mechanical engineers.

Support staff does not usually fall into the Exempt classification. Someone once said, “Well, let’s change their job duties so we can make them Exempt.” You really can’t change the job duties of a receptionist or mail clerk to make them fit into an exempt category. Plus, they probably don’t make twice the minimum wage.

As managers, we try to protect organization from labor disputes by classifying employees correctly. Some employees are well versed in California labor law, not just for their own personal use, but also for advising clients. We must classify employees correctly and not try to make them fit into one category or another. The labor board just won't buy it.


Reference: 2008 California Labor Law Digest. California Chamber of Commerce.

Thursday, August 6, 2009

Death of a Co-worker




This a subject not discussed in business administration classes. How does an office deal with the death of a co-worker? As a manager, how do you handle the grief yourself and the grief of others at the same time? Recently, this very situation has happened in my office. I was told by the President about the passing of a 46 year old co-worker. I gasped so loud I think others heard me through my closed door. My boss was having such a hard time getting the words out, that I thought I was being fired. I was shocked to say the least. The President advised he was going to advise a few other people, and then I needed to arrange an all staff office meeting. I could not even think, let alone, arrange a meeting. I finally gathered my thoughts and arranged a meeting for an hour later. In that hour, I had to confine my feelings and emotions until everyone was told. Hard to do, but since I was in shock, I just denied what I had heard.

The President made the announcement at the meeting. Everyone was in shock; some started crying instantly, and while others where just in a daze. As a manager and professional, somehow, I had to reach down deep and find the strength to deal with my own sorrow, while at the same time deal with the sorrow of everyone else. Since I had an hour head start on dealing with the sad news, I probably had an advantage in helping others deal with the news. After the meeting, I gathered myself enough to be able to walk around the office and check on people. I know they were not “okay” but I asked anyway. Some employees wanted to talk about it; while others retreated to their cubicle and wanted to be alone. Each person dealt with the grief in their own way. I just kept watch. I decided an email to an individual might be more appropriate than a face to face discussion for those who wanted to be left alone. Not much work got done, understandably so.

On the second day, the weight of the sadness was still pretty heavy, but employees were more open to talking. On the third day, the office mood was still pretty heavy, but I noticed people started to coming to terms with the death, and were more at peace. It was still hard to walk by his office and see his family portraits, plaques, paintings, and all the individual items. I did not deem it appropriate to immediately clean out the office, but it will have to be done eventually.

We decided to have a lunch in his honor. Since there are no services, per his wishes, we had our own office tribute to him. We decided to have a slide show to display fun pictures of him during lunch. Surprisingly, gathering all the pictures for the slide show was very therapeutic. All the fun times, smiles, and laughs helped me come to terms and accept his sudden death. The lunch memorial gave some closure to staff and hopefully some peace. We told different stories of fun times with Glenn. We laughed, and we cried. It was good for everyone.

We are creating a scrapbook of all the pictures and stories to present to his family.

When I think I have experienced the hardest point in my career, I am hit with a new level of difficulty.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Employee or Independent Contractor?


I have had the opportunity to discuss employee classification on several occasions in my profession. Or, should I say I have tried to convince employers that they cannot just 1099 a worker and call them an independent contractor. A contractor agreement will not be enough to say a person is an independent contractor either. To determine whether a person is an employee or an independent contract depends on the control the employer has over the worker. Does the employer tell the worker what time to come to work and when to leave? Does employer have policies and procedures which govern the workers job position? Do they provide them with a job description? Does the worker perform duties for the employer exclusively or do they also work for others? Does the worker have their own insurance? There is not just one test that will classify an employee vs. contractor relationship, but if the operations of the worker are controlled by the employer, the worker is probably an employee. In California, a worker is presumed to be an employee and the proof lies with the employer to prove otherwise. In Gardner v. Baby Trend Inc., 2009, where the employer argued the plaintiff was an independent contractor, but the court ruled he was not, and awarded 8.4 million to the employee (Gartner). Classifying employees should not be taken lightly, and in California, if classification is borderline, chances are the worker is an employee.


Reference

Gartner, L. (2009) Verdict Serves as Costly Reminder on Worker Classification in California
retreived from SHRM website 7/21/09.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Safety in the Workplace

Guess what? Since my last blog, we have a new alarm system! Hooray!

So, now is a good time to discuss …

Personal Safety in the Workplace

Here are some precautions to take:

Try not to work alone after hours. Try to avoid working alone. Always let someone know if you must stay late. Leaving in pairs is always safer. There is safety in numbers.
Make sure all doors are locked when staying late.
Leave all the lights on when working late. The janitors or timers will turn them off during the week at most offices.

Do not give out scan cards or keys or leave the door open for visitors or delivery people. Let them come through the receptionist desk and sign in. If possible have the receptionist area cut off from the rest of the office, so people can not walk around the office without being checked in and taken back with the employee.

Keep your personal property personal. Lock up your purse. Don’t leave it unattended.

Be aware of your surroundings especially in the parking lot. We once had someone sitting between two of our parked cars. Take two seconds to look around as you walk towards your car to check out potential risks. Is anyone loitering?

Be aware that anyone can use the restroom or be in a secluded hallway.

Only carry the essentials. Don’t’ carry or leave at work unnecessary cash or valuables.

Be safe when you get in your car. Lock the doors right away.

Watch what you say. Be careful to no give out personal or company information. Eavesdropping is a problem when on your cell phone or even on your cubicle phone. Don’t give out information, such as the doors are unlocked most of the time or any other security information.

If there is a threatening situation in the office, dial 911, you don’t even have to talk to them. Just dial 911 and put the phone down on the desk, they will come when you don't answer them or if they hear trouble in the background.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Is this the real sign of the times?


Recently, our office experienced a burglary. Most desks were broken into, rummaged through, stuff thrown out of drawers, and items moved. The only items taken were money and food. What? No computers, servers, printers, scanners, or anything really of value was taken. They could have done significant damage to our infrastructure, but didn’t. Was it the homeless, a disgruntled employee, inside job, or just a complete stranger? Accusations are flying around the office, but we really just need to let the police do their job. For all we know, this could be just a piece of a larger puzzle.

The real concern is the question: Is increased crime going to be a sign of the times? Is this something we need to expect and accept? Desperate times could mean desperate measures for some.

We must accept that this could happen and try to prepare for it, or rather, prevent it from happening. Increased alarm systems and giving employees more information on safety is my suggestion. Make sure that if a break-in happens that the person(s) will be scared off and if possible, caught. Alarms and cameras can do the job pretty easily. Employees who work late or on the weekends are at risk. Making sure those employees are aware of the dangers and know how to keep themselves safe should be the primary concern of the organization.

I won’t say it in other arenas, but here, I’ll say it….I told you so!

Organizational Change Strategies

Change models are educational ways of dealing with change within the business world. We will have to be prepared for restructuring of our organization, possible layoffs, and new technology. Organizational transformation will need to occur in order for the overall goals of the company to be achieved. Being able to change will allow the organization to have a more stable environment and allow the employees and organization to be successful.

One change model that initiates successful change is for top management to be involved. Someone from top management needs to be a visionary and be persuasive and consistent (McNamara, 2008). He or she will be the person that has the change agent role and is responsible for communicating what will change and how it will change. The change agent will convey a realistic plan and carry out the plan. Communication needs to be frequent and with all employees. The structure of the organization itself needs to be modified along with the policies and procedures. This model includes the unfreezing, change, and refreezing of the organization (Rose, 2002). The unfreezing step of the change process involves opening up the organization for discussion and allowing all employees to give their input on how they believe which changes should occur and how we should implement the changes. If employees have input about the changes, they are less likely to be resistant to the changes and take ownership of them. The leader should meet with the managers and staff and explain why the changes must take place. Once the changes are decided upon, organizations can then begin to implement them. The organization will then refreeze the policies and procedures as they are approved and implemented. This model is most effective when top management wants to be involved in the changes, and they want the staff to be involved also. The advantage of this model is that each employee has input, and the executives can hear the concerns of the staff. The disadvantage is that not everyone will come to a consensus, and this opens up the changes to a wide variety of opinions and personal agendas. At some point, a decision must be made, and it may not satisfy the needs of everyone.

Another change model used in the business sector is modified from the Kubler Ross Grief Model (Morris, 2008). This includes the following four stages: Denial, Resistance, Exploration, Acceptance or Commitment. When an announcement is made that one organization is purchasing another, there is first the denial stage in which staff is in disbelief. Some staff will just refuse to believe that the organization will make such changes. Then, once staff realizes the changes are going to happen, some will be resistant to the changes. Those employees are scared of change and of the unknown. They might even feel they will not change with the new company and may try to explore other options, such as finding another job. The exploration of other options will ensue and the company may lose staff. Those who stay with the organization will have no alternative but to accept the changes. Organizations will want the staff to commit to the changes, be positive, and be a good example to others during times of change. This change model is most effective when change is imminent, and there are no negotiations with staff. This model helps managers and executives understand the emotions employees’ go through when change is forced upon them. The advantage of this model is knowledge. With this knowledge, executives will be better prepared to deal with the resistance when they know the emotional steps people with go through. The disadvantage of this model is that there is no employee input. Employees may be reluctant to change when they have no input.

The change model that I like is John Kotter’s 8-Step Strategy (Morris, 2008). The first step is to create a sense of urgency. The change must happen now because the organization is changing now and we do not want to be divided in doing processes in two or more different ways. The leaders must create this urgency and explain the reason for the change. They can convey the positive opportunities that will occur with the change and convey the potential crises that might occur if the change does not happen.

The second step is to form a team that will be in charge of leading the change, and members will include staff and executives. The team will need to be influential in order for the change to occur, so executive participation is crucial.

Third, there needs to be a vision and strategy for the change. The direction of the company must be communicated to staff so they will also know the vision of the future, rather than just being asked to change because executives said so.

The fourth step is to communicate the vision to staff. This can be in the form of a corporate announcement, email, or even posters. Leaders will be good examples of the vision and act in a way that always keeps the vision in mind with their daily activities.

The next element is to empower employees to act upon the vision. If employees see something can be done that is in line with the new vision, then they are to act. Staff can remove the obstacles to change and be allowed to develop new ideas.

The next step is to create short term goals. When the vision gets old, and people tend to steer away from it, the short term goals will help keep an obtainable accomplishment in front of them. Staff will be more likely to meet short term goals because they can see the end goal in sight. A twelve month goal that is obtainable keeps the sense of urgency in front of employees. Rewarding staff for the short term goals keeps employees motivated and active in the change effort (Morris, 2008).

The seventh step is to take the improvements and expound upon them. The short term goals are only the steps to the vision, so we need to continue to work toward the greater vision, and be consistent in driving towards the changes that need to be implemented.

The last step in Kotters 8-step strategy is to reinforce the changes and make them permanent. The leaders will need to make the connection between the changes and the corporate success and show that the new ways are now the new culture, policies and procedures, and they are here to stay. The advantage of this 8-step model is that employees and executives work together to arrive at a cohesive environment for implementing the desired changes. The disadvantage is that there is a lot of work, time, and effort to go through all eight steps. This model takes commitment from all staff but will be worth the effort in the long run as it will create a better change environment for employees and executives.


References

Rose, K. H. (2002) Leading change: a model by John Kotter. Retrieved October
28, 2008 from http://www.esi-
intl.com/public/publications/22002changemanagement.asp.

McNamara, C. (2008) Basic context for organizational change. Retrieved October
21, 2008 from http://www.managementhelp.org/mgmnt/orgchnge.htm.

Morris, M. (2008) Managing change in organizational development. Retrieved
October 28, 2008 from
http://www.rapidbi.com/created/changemanagement.html.

Sunday, May 31, 2009

Organizational Changes....Now what?

Companies have been forced to make major changes in order to survive, and employees are resisting these changes. When organizational decisions become more centralized, there tends to be some resistance from employees. Organizations go through major changes, and employees tend to resist as they are unsure of the change, concerned about their jobs, and worried how the changes will affect them. These negative feelings regarding the changes to be implemented could impact the business, and the positives that should come from the change are not seen. Organizations must approach change with the whole organization in mind.

Today, organizations must change or die (Robbins & Judge, 2007). If organizations stay the same with the new technology, political, regulation, and product changes, the organization will eventually be outside the marketplace. Change is essential. But, we must to adjust the organization by providing training, creating new policies and procedures, and communicating these to employees early in the change process. Technology changes so fast that once we update the computer system, a new and improved model is already on its way. If employees do not learn a newly implemented computer system, they will be left behind. In essence, employees are forced to learn new computer skills or risk becoming obsolete.

The changes are intentional to improve the organization, so employees must adapt to the changes. This can be scary for employees, but if managed properly, the changes can create opportunities for innovation and improved efficiency. The success of an organization lies with the employees, so it is imperative that changes are managed properly. There are techniques organizations can use to help manage change in order to help employees to be positive about the changes.

Continued in the next blog….



Robbins, S.P. & Judge, T.A. (2007). Organizational behavior (12th edition).
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education Corp.

Monday, May 25, 2009

Memorial Day Tribute


Thank you to all Servicemen servicewomen, and Veterans.







Thank you to all the veterans who paid the ultimate sacrifice for our freedom. Freedom is not free. This Memorial Day, I am humbled by those who are willing to risk their lives for our country. When my son was in Iraq, I decided to send his platoon some goodies for Christmas. Due the overwhelming response I received from family, friends, and even strangers, we adopted three platoons. My emails asking for help reached out to hundreds of people, and it wasn’t long before my living and dining rooms were full of food and sundries to send to the troops. I was at the post office so many times; the postmaster and I became friends. When my son came back from Iraq, we went to the Base to welcome him back. While in the nearby town, we realized that almost everywhere we looked there were Marines, servicemen either on their way to Iraq, or they just got back. I still had some funds left in the account, so at the spur of the moment, we decided to buy dinner for every serviceman in the restaurant. It was a great experience. These men (no women there at the time) were just kids in my eyes, just like my son, but in another way, they were men, but bigger than life. Thank you so much for your service and for keeping me safe and free!

Friday, May 15, 2009

Oh no, not another layoff!

Handling Lay Off's Professionally

Unfortunately, across the nation, organizations have cut back on employees which is one of their most expensive commodity in an organization, but also, the most valuable. One of the most difficult tasks of an HR manager is handling terminations. However, an involuntary termination is different from a lay off. With an involuntary termination, the employee has usually been warned more than once, so the termination should not be a surprise. The HR manager is usually very ready for the employee to have an opportunity somewhere else. A layoff usually is a surprise to those affected, and is usually not due to work performance. The HR manager is the bearer of bad news, and advising employees they have been selected for the layoff is very hard emotionally for the HR manager as well as the employee. The HR manager must keep their composure during the layoff notifications. How do HR managers handle this?

First, be prepared. Be prepared mentally. Be prepared with a script and try not to waiver from it. Be sure to not say “sorry,” as that could indicate the organization is doing something wrong. I like to use the phrase “it is unfortunate...” Next, be prepared emotionally. Do not get emotional even when the employee does. Have tissues ready. You can show sympathy by tone of voice, speech, and body language. If you must, act like a robot to get through it, do it. If you have several terminations to perform in one day, being regimen and having an agenda may be the only way to get through them. Then, after the terminations have been done, be sure to get away from the office for at least an hour to recoup. Go ahead and be emotional when you are by yourself. Then, come back to the office composed and ready to have a meeting with the remaining staff. Provide encouragement that this was a business decision for the survival of the company, and we must carry on, and we are still a great team. Again, the emotional state of mind will help the HR manager get through the face to face communication with staff. If executive management can conduct the meeting, it will mean more to the staff. The morale will be low but with positive attitude towards the future and sympathy towards those lost will help the environment of the organization to come around eventually.

I had a terminated employee give me a hug and tell me my job sucks...they were right. The task of laying off employees has been the hardest task of my career.

Pam Binns